Dana Guzman vs Candela Vazquez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jul at 07:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Guzman vs C. Vazquez

PER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Guzman 1 - 0 Vazquez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dana Guzman winning 2 and Candela Vazquez winning 0. The last match between Dana Guzman and Candela Vazquez was at the W35 Pergamino, 29-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Dana Guzman getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guzman | 1 |
| Vazquez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Pergamino(07-29-25)
D. Guzman vs C. Vazquez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.64% (28-16) | Career Total W/L | 60.00% (48-32) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Guzman vs C. Vazquez Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance slightly favors Guzman, winning 40% of points compared to Vazquez's 39.39%.
- How do their return stats compare? Guzman has been more effective on first serve returns, securing 38.9%, while Vazquez excels at attacking the second serve with 53.45% success.
- Under pressure, Vazquez has shown slightly better breakpoint resilience, saving 46.43% against Guzman's 42.31%.
- Looking at match performance over the past year, Vazquez has a strong winning record of 71.43%, surpassing Guzman's 60% win rate.
- Guzman fares better on Hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Vazquez shines on Clay, boasting a 63% success rate.
- Both players compete mostly at the Challengers/ITF level with similar win percentages; however, Guzman has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents than Vazquez.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Vazquez has an edge with a 67% success rate in these situations compared to Guzman's 50%.
- Guzman demonstrates better breakpoint conversion, scoring 42.59% of opportunities, while Vazquez trails at 34.09%.
Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features Guzman and Vazquez, whose statistics reveal intriguing insights into their gameplay. Guzman's slight advantage in second serve performance suggests a marginal edge in serving, despite both players showing similar results.
When it comes to returning serve, Vazquez holds the upper hand on second serve returns, indicating an ability to capitalize on opponents’ lesser serves, yet Guzman's first serve return strength can't be overlooked.
In pressure situations, Vazquez's higher breakpoint saving percentage shows resilience, perhaps contributing to their superior recent match win percentage of 71.43% compared to Guzman's 60%.
Guzman’s proficiency on Hard courts might pose a challenge for Vazquez, whose forte lies on Clay surfaces. However, Vazquez's capacity to perform in deciding sets and overall robustness this year signifies a competitive edge.
Considering these factors, while Guzman showcases several competitive attributes, the prediction leans towards Vazquez as the likely victor, given their slightly superior overall form and adaptability under pressure.
Dana Guzman vs Candela Vazquez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Guzman vs C. Vazquez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:23:32 | Average Match Time | 1:23:32 |
| 68% (32/47) | 1st Serve % | 71% (36/51) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 47% (7/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (4/15) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 63% (32/51) | Return Points Win % | 36% (17/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Guzman Recent Matches Played
C. Vazquez Recent Matches Played

D. Guzman vs C. Vazquez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.64% (28/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (48/32) |
| 62.50% (65/39) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.34% (108/74) |
| 54.98% (513/420) | Games Win/Loss | 53.87% (876/750) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 63.33% (19/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.26% (47/31) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 8 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 104 | Total Double Faults | 307 |
| 1:48:24 | Average Match Time | 1:39:53 |
| 444.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 433.18 |
| 79% (2271/2871) | 1st Serve % | 69% (3151/4597) |
| 56% (1281/2271) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1854/3151) |
| 45% (270/600) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (606/1446) |
| 53% (212/398) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (305/624) |
| 50% (1376/2737) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2181/4626) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65.79% (25/13) | Challenger W/L | 53.19% (25/22) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 69.70% (23/10) |
| 65% (28/43) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (47/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 86% (6/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 56% (9/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 88% (24/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (47/42) |
| 13% (24/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (47/5) |
| 40% (20/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (33/7) |